The Southern African Development Community (SADC) has formally requested Rwanda’s assistance in facilitating the safe withdrawal of its peacekeeping troops from eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), multiple sources confirmed Thursday.
The unprecedented request comes amid heightened tensions in North Kivu province, where SADC forces have been engaged in joint operations with Congolese armed forces (FARDC) against the M23 rebel group. The strategic city of Goma has remained under rebel control since January, creating complex logistical challenges for international forces.
A high-level source, speaking on condition of anonymity, told USA New Times that Rwanda has agreed to cooperate with the withdrawal plan.
“This is a welcome development that’s in line with the Africa-led process to find lasting peace and security in the region, and the exit will be facilitated in a friendly manner,” the source said, confirming the request was submitted this week.
The proposed withdrawal follows a March 28 agreement between SADC and M23 rebels, brokered at Goma’s Serena Hotel, which guaranteed safe passage for departing troops with their weapons and equipment. However, the deal stipulated that all Congolese military assets must remain behind.
The diplomatic maneuvering occurs against a backdrop of renewed violence. On April 11, heavy gunfire erupted in Goma’s Lac Vert and Keshero neighborhoods—the first major clashes since M23 assumed control of the city.
The Alliance Fleuve Congo (AFC), an M23 affiliate, has accused SADC forces of coordinating attacks with FARDC and controversial allied groups, including:
- The FDLR (Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda), a UN-sanctioned militia founded by perpetrators of Rwanda’s 1994 genocide
- Wazalendo (patriotic) militias
- Burundian forces
SADC has denied these allegations, calling them “inaccurate and misleading” in an April 14 statement.
The potential withdrawal spotlights the complex dynamics of Congo’s conflict, where SADC’s Southern African Mission in the DRC (SAMIDRC) has operated alongside problematic partners. Analysts note the mission’s collaboration with FDLR—which maintains genocidal ambitions against Rwanda—has drawn particular criticism.
“The FDLR’s presence in these operations fundamentally compromises regional security,” said Dr. Paul Nantulya, a research associate at the Africa Center for Strategic Studies. “Their inclusion undermines the legitimacy of any peacekeeping effort.”
Rwanda’s role in facilitating the withdrawal could mark a turning point in regional diplomacy. While Kigali has long criticized Congo’s use of FDLR forces, its cooperation with SADC suggests pragmatic engagement.
Security experts warn the transition period remains precarious. “The key challenge will be ensuring this withdrawal doesn’t create a security vacuum,” said Liesl Louw-Vaudran, senior researcher at the Institute for Security Studies. “All parties must prioritize civilian protection during this sensitive phase.”
As of press time, neither SADC nor the Rwandan government had released official statements regarding the withdrawal timeline. However, sources indicate planning is underway for a phased exit through Rwandan territory in the coming weeks.
