July 21, 2025 — Washington, D.C.
Harvard University and the administration of President Donald Trump entered into a crucial courtroom battle on Monday as the university contested the government’s move to strip away $2.2 billion in research grants. The university’s legal representative, Steven Lehotsky, argued the cut was a direct violation of fundamental constitutional protections.
“This case is about our constitutional liberties,” Lehotsky told the judge, describing the administration’s actions as an attempt to penalize Harvard for political reasons.
The federal government, for its part, defended its ability to end agreements with institutions that no longer align with national policy goals. Officials cited Harvard’s handling of antisemitic activity as the justification for the move, claiming the university has not adequately addressed the issue.
Justice Department lawyer Michael Velchik, a Harvard alumnus, stated, “If Harvard truly valued its research efforts, it would take stronger steps against antisemitism.” The administration pointed to campus protests and rhetoric as examples of what it perceives as Harvard’s inaction.
Harvard filed its legal complaint in April, adding to a growing list of disputes between the university and Trump officials. The administration has also suggested removing Harvard’s nonprofit tax status, investigated international financial contributions to the school, and criticized its admission policies concerning international students.
Legal experts suggest that the court’s decision could carry national implications, potentially reshaping how future administrations interact with higher education institutions when it comes to funding and policy enforcement.
